TIMELY INFORMATION ABOUT SCHOOL & YOUR CHILD!
|
|
Take that Chrome book and be certain it gets coated with dust for the duration of summer vacation. Hopefully you can convince the school district, as informed districts are starting, and return to books in the fall. |
|
|
Do not go to summer school this year. Your child will be overburdened enough when school starts again. If your child is in a make-up or other situation where the school advised a summer session, contact us on how to protect your child's eyes.
Get your kids out in the sun: run, jump, skip, roll in the grass, play ball, laugh, tell stories, swim, splash in the water, discover mud again, play with the dog, participate in sandlot games, take pictures, just plain have fun. Your and your child's vision will be better for it . . . and yes, your child will be better prepared for learning when school begins. |
![Picture](/uploads/4/1/3/8/41383103/editor/bigstock-thinking-child-bored-frustrat-127017875.jpg?1717258767)
Yet, this past school year some children only endured their time at the desk with the tablets and unanswerable questions.
![Picture](/uploads/4/1/3/8/41383103/shutterstock-44072_orig.jpg)
Is your child among the 25% who could not keep up with the rest of the class? Does your child have to revisit the same grade? Will your child need special attention next year that ads to the burden your child had to endure last year? Maybe your child has a visually related learning problem. After all, experts say at least 80% of learning takes place through the vision system.
Yet your child passed the school vision screening program, you say. Unfortunately, well intended with the start in 1947, at best, screening detects mainly those with good grades and poor eyesight. Even then, it is too late to reverse most of the eyesight conditions. At worst, it gives a false impression vision is not causing your child’s learning problem. Maybe you have that false impression.
|
|
|
Remember school screening started in 1947 and minimally changed in 2005 with no recognizable difference. In other words, it has not changed since 1947. California School Screening does not detect a visually related learning problem, the very reason for which it was designed. Vision processing, the most important vision skill in visually related learning problems, was not put in widespread treatment until 1988.
|
Give us a call at 334-2020 and find out if a visually related learning problem exists and have it treated before school stats again.
|
|
A teacher discussion on Facebook
A teacher discussing digital learning mentioned, “... 2 years ago 9 of my 24 students had ... prescription ...glasses, last year it was ... closer to 5 or 6 but that is still a lot.”
Vision conditions she was able to observe varied from 38% to 25%. We already know that 25% of our students are failing, and that stat is too many. My patients don’t show up yearly for their exams as advised. Some insurance companies advise two years, and not all do that. Some kids are prescribed glasses but don’t wear them. Thus, some of the 75% to 62% not observed to wear glasses may need them. However, the need for compensative eyeglasses (incorrectly labeled corrective) is not the only vision condition. The more common conditions are related to binocular vision. At least 60% of my patients have binocular vision difficulty.
An educator’s concern may be directed to conditions interfering with learning. The Dartmouth Study done decades ago found myopia has nothing to do with learning. The opposite is true. The good learners have the worst visual acuity. Visual acuity is the only finding our antiquated misleading school screening uses. That may be why good learners wear glasses. Binocular vision does affect learning but by about only one grade level. The one factor that is involved in learning, vision processing, isn’t even considered in school screening and is missed by many eye doctors. Vision processing difficulty can bring you from an A to an F. We haven’t even considered reduced vision fields from traumatic brain injury, much more common than thought. It is safe to say 75% of our students have a vision condition that in varying degrees interferes with their lives. Why do we want to worsen it with digital learning?
A teacher discussing digital learning mentioned, “... 2 years ago 9 of my 24 students had ... prescription ...glasses, last year it was ... closer to 5 or 6 but that is still a lot.”
Vision conditions she was able to observe varied from 38% to 25%. We already know that 25% of our students are failing, and that stat is too many. My patients don’t show up yearly for their exams as advised. Some insurance companies advise two years, and not all do that. Some kids are prescribed glasses but don’t wear them. Thus, some of the 75% to 62% not observed to wear glasses may need them. However, the need for compensative eyeglasses (incorrectly labeled corrective) is not the only vision condition. The more common conditions are related to binocular vision. At least 60% of my patients have binocular vision difficulty.
An educator’s concern may be directed to conditions interfering with learning. The Dartmouth Study done decades ago found myopia has nothing to do with learning. The opposite is true. The good learners have the worst visual acuity. Visual acuity is the only finding our antiquated misleading school screening uses. That may be why good learners wear glasses. Binocular vision does affect learning but by about only one grade level. The one factor that is involved in learning, vision processing, isn’t even considered in school screening and is missed by many eye doctors. Vision processing difficulty can bring you from an A to an F. We haven’t even considered reduced vision fields from traumatic brain injury, much more common than thought. It is safe to say 75% of our students have a vision condition that in varying degrees interferes with their lives. Why do we want to worsen it with digital learning?